Nissan Cube 1998 vs Mitsubishi Space Star 1998
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.3 (petrol) | 1.3 - 1.9 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 82 - 101 HP | 82 - 122 HP | |
| Torque: | 106 - 123 NM | 117 - 215 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 10.2 - 14.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 - 6.8 | 5.5 - 8.8 | |
|
Nissan Cube petrol engines consumes on average 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi Space Star. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.75 m | 4.03 m | |
| Width: | 1.61 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.63 m | 1.52 m | |
|
Nissan Cube is smaller, but higher. Nissan Cube is 28 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Space Star, 11 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Cube is 11 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 180 litres | 370 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1370 litres | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Star has more luggage space. Nissan Cube has 190 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi Space Star. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`319 | ~ 1`698 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Cube has
|
Mitsubishi Space Star has
| |