Nissan Cube 2002 vs Renault Kangoo 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nissan Cube is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Renault Kangoo has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Engines: | 1.4 - 1.5 (petrol) | 1.0 - 1.9 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 98 - 109 HP | 55 - 95 HP | |
| Torque: | 137 - 148 NM | 81 - 185 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16.4 seconds | 10.7 - 21.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 5.3 - 8.6 | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.73 m | 4.00 m | |
| Width: | 1.67 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.64 m | 1.84 m | |
| Nissan Cube is 27 cm shorter than the Renault Kangoo, 1 cm wider, while the height of Nissan Cube is 20 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 650 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1250 litres | 2600 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.4 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Cube is 1.4 metres less than that of the Renault Kangoo, which means Nissan Cube can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 1`684 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Cube has
|
Renault Kangoo has
| |