Nissan Cube 2002 vs Hyundai Matrix 2001
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nissan Cube is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Hyundai Matrix has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Nissan Cube is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Hyundai Matrix can be equipped only with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.4 - 1.5 (petrol) | 1.5 - 1.8 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 98 - 109 HP | 82 - 123 HP | |
| Torque: | 137 - 148 NM | 141 - 235 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16.4 seconds | 11.3 - 17.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 5.4 - 9.1 | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.73 m | 4.02 m | |
| Width: | 1.67 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.64 m | 1.64 m | |
|
Nissan Cube is smaller. Nissan Cube is 29 cm shorter than the Hyundai Matrix, 7 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 354 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1250 litres | 1284 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.4 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Cube is 1 metres less than that of the Hyundai Matrix, which means Nissan Cube can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 1`813 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Cube has
|
Hyundai Matrix has
| |