Nissan Cube 2008 vs Opel Meriva 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.5 - 1.8 | 1.2 - 1.7 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 109 - 122 HP | 75 - 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 148 - 240 NM | 130 - 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.3 - 12.4 seconds | 9 - 16.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 - 8.7 | 4.1 - 6.7 | |
|
Nissan Cube petrol engines consumes on average 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Opel Meriva. On average, Nissan Cube equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Meriva. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.97 m | 4.29 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.62 m | |
|
Nissan Cube is smaller, but higher. Nissan Cube is 32 cm shorter than the Opel Meriva, 20 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Cube is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 323 litres | 400 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1645 litres | 1500 litres | |
| Nissan Cube has 77 litres less trunk space than the Opel Meriva. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Cube (by 145 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Cube is 1.3 metres less than that of the Opel Meriva, which means Nissan Cube can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`750 | ~ 1`964 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Opel Meriva scores higher in safety tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 5800 | 5400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Cube has
|
Opel Meriva has
| |