Nissan Cube 2008 vs Nissan Pulsar 2014
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Minivan / MPV | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Engines: | 1.5 - 1.8 | 1.2 - 1.6 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 109 - 122 HP | 110 - 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 148 - 240 NM | 165 - 260 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.3 - 12.4 seconds | 7.7 - 12.7 seconds | |
| In general, Nissan Pulsar are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Nissan Cube. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 - 8.7 | 3.6 - 5.1 | |
|
Nissan Cube petrol engines consumes on average 2.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than Nissan Pulsar. On average, Nissan Cube equipped with diesel engines consume 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Pulsar. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.97 m | 4.39 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.52 m | |
|
Nissan Cube is smaller, but higher. Nissan Cube is 42 cm shorter than the Nissan Pulsar, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Cube is 16 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 323 litres | 385 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1645 litres | 1395 litres | |
| Nissan Cube has 62 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Pulsar. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Cube (by 250 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| Gross weight: | ~ 1`750 kg | ~ 1`768 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`304 kg | ~ 1`252 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 446 kg | ~ 516 kg | |
| Nissan Cube load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 16 procentiem less than Nissan Pulsar. Therefore, Nissan Pulsar is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | |||
| Nissan Pulsar scores higher in safety tests. The Nissan Cube scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 5400 | 5800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Cube has
|
Nissan Pulsar has
| |