Nissan Cube 2008 vs Hyundai ix20 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Body: | Minivan / MPV | Hatchback | |
---|---|---|---|
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
Engines: | 1.5 - 1.8 | 1.4 - 1.6 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 109 - 122 HP | 90 - 124 HP | |
Torque: | 148 - 240 NM | 137 - 260 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.3 - 12.4 seconds | 10.9 - 14.5 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 - 8.7 | 4.3 - 6.5 | |
Nissan Cube petrol engines consumes on average 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than Hyundai ix20. On average, Nissan Cube equipped with diesel engines consume 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai ix20. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.97 m | 4.10 m | |
Width: | 1.70 m | 1.77 m | |
Height: | 1.67 m | 1.60 m | |
Nissan Cube is smaller, but higher. Nissan Cube is 14 cm shorter than the Hyundai ix20, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Cube is 7 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 323 litres | 440 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1645 litres | 1486 litres | |
Nissan Cube has 117 litres less trunk space than the Hyundai ix20. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Cube (by 159 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 10.4 meters | |
The turning circle of the Nissan Cube is 0.2 metres less than that of the Hyundai ix20. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`750 | ~ 1`752 | |
Safety: | |||
Hyundai ix20 scores higher in safety tests. The Nissan Cube scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
Quality: | no data | average | |
Average price (€): | 5600 | 4800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Cube has
|
Hyundai ix20 has
| |