Nissan Cube 2008 vs Ford B-Max 2012
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.5 - 1.8 | 1.0 - 1.6 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 109 - 122 HP | 75 - 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 148 - 240 NM | 125 - 215 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.3 - 12.4 seconds | 11.2 - 15.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 - 8.7 | 3.8 - 6.4 | |
|
Nissan Cube petrol engines consumes on average 2.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Ford B-Max. On average, Nissan Cube equipped with diesel engines consume 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford B-Max. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.97 m | 4.08 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.60 m | |
|
Nissan Cube is smaller, but higher. Nissan Cube is 11 cm shorter than the Ford B-Max, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Cube is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 323 litres | 318 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1645 litres | 1386 litres | |
| Nissan Cube has 5 litres more trunk space than the Ford B-Max. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Cube (by 259 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Cube is 0.3 metres less than that of the Ford B-Max. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`750 | ~ 1`779 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Ford B-Max scores higher in safety tests. The Nissan Cube scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 5600 | 7200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Cube has
|
Ford B-Max has
| |