Nissan Cube 2008 vs Citroen Nemo 2009
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Nissan Cube is available with both manual and automatic gearboxes, whereas Citroen Nemo is available only with manual gearbox. | |||
Engines: | 1.5 - 1.8 | 1.4 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 109 - 122 HP | 68 - 73 HP | |
Torque: | 148 - 240 NM | 118 - 160 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.3 - 12.4 seconds | 16.2 - 18 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 - 8.7 | 4.5 - 6.6 | |
Nissan Cube petrol engines consumes on average 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Citroen Nemo. On average, Nissan Cube equipped with diesel engines consume 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Nemo. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.97 m | 3.96 m | |
Width: | 1.70 m | 1.87 m | |
Height: | 1.67 m | 1.72 m | |
Nissan Cube and Citroen Nemo are practically the same length. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 323 litres | 360 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1645 litres | no data | |
Citroen Nemo has more luggage space. Nissan Cube has 37 litres less trunk space than the Citroen Nemo. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 10 meters | |
The turning circle of the Nissan Cube is 0.2 metres more than that of the Citroen Nemo. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`750 | ~ 1`695 | |
Safety: | |||
Nissan Cube scores higher in safety tests, but Citroen Nemo is better rated in child safety tests. The Nissan Cube scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 5800 | 2800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Cube has
|
Citroen Nemo has
| |