Nissan Almera Tino 2000 vs Volkswagen Touran 2004
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 114 HP | 140 HP | |
Torque: | 230 NM | 320 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | 10.2 seconds | |
Volkswagen Touran is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Almera Tino engine produces 26 HP less power than Volkswagen Touran, whereas torque is 90 NM less than Volkswagen Touran. Due to the lower power, Nissan Almera Tino reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 6.0 | |
The Volkswagen Touran is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Almera Tino consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Touran, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Almera Tino could require 60 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 930 km in combined cycle | 1000 km in combined cycle | |
1130 km on highway | 1150 km on highway | ||
Volkswagen Touran gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Ground clearance: | 150 mm (5.9 inches) | 127 mm (5 inches) | |
Because of the higher ground clearance, Nissan Almera Tino can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Nissan Almera Tino version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.26 m | 4.39 m | |
Width: | 1.76 m | 1.79 m | |
Height: | 1.61 m | 1.65 m | |
Nissan Almera Tino is smaller. Nissan Almera Tino is 13 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Touran, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Almera Tino is 4 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 440 litres | 695 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1950 litres | 1989 litres | |
Volkswagen Touran has more luggage space. Nissan Almera Tino has 255 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Touran. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Touran (by 39 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 11.2 meters | |
The turning circle of the Nissan Almera Tino is 0.8 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Touran, which means Nissan Almera Tino can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`940 | 2`210 | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | no data | average | |
Average price (€): | 1000 | 1600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Almera Tino has
|
Volkswagen Touran has
| |