Nissan Almera Tino 2000 vs Mitsubishi Space Runner 1999
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Double-row timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 114 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 NM | 178 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | 11 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Runner is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Almera Tino engine produces 22 HP less power than Mitsubishi Space Runner, but torque is 52 NM more than Mitsubishi Space Runner. Due to the lower power, Nissan Almera Tino reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 9.2 | |
|
The Nissan Almera Tino is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Almera Tino consumes 2.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Space Runner, which means that by driving the Nissan Almera Tino over 15,000 km in a year you can save 420 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 63 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 930 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
| 1130 km on highway | 840 km on highway | ||
| Nissan Almera Tino gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 390'000 km | 520'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mitsubishi Space Runner engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 3 years | 44 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Nissan Almera | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Mitsubishi Lancer, Mitsubishi Outlander, Mitsubishi Space Wagon | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Space Runner might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Mitsubishi Space Runner engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.26 m | 4.29 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.65 m | |
| Nissan Almera Tino is 3 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Space Runner, 6 cm wider, while the height of Nissan Almera Tino is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 440 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1950 litres | 1800 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Nissan Almera Tino has 10 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Space Runner. The Mitsubishi Space Runner may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Almera Tino (by 150 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`940 | 1`880 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Almera Tino has
|
Mitsubishi Space Runner has
| |