Nissan Almera Tino 2000 vs Renault Scenic 2001
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Double-row timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 114 HP | 105 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | 12.8 seconds | |
|
Nissan Almera Tino is more dynamic to drive. Nissan Almera Tino engine produces 9 HP more power than Renault Scenic, whereas torque is 30 NM more than Renault Scenic. Thanks to more power Nissan Almera Tino reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 5.9 | |
|
The Renault Scenic is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Almera Tino consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Scenic, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Almera Tino could require 75 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 930 km in combined cycle | 1010 km in combined cycle | |
| 1130 km on highway | 1220 km on highway | ||
| Renault Scenic gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 3 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Nissan Almera | Installed on at least 11 other car models, including Volvo V40, Renault Laguna, Volvo S40, Mitsubishi Carisma | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Scenic might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.26 m | 4.17 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Nissan Almera Tino is larger, but lower. Nissan Almera Tino is 9 cm longer than the Renault Scenic, 6 cm wider, while the height of Nissan Almera Tino is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 440 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1950 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Almera Tino is 0.3 metres less than that of the Renault Scenic. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`940 | 1`300 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Almera Tino has
|
Renault Scenic has
| |