Nissan Almera Tino 2000 vs Renault Scenic 2001
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Double-row timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 114 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 NM | 148 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
| Nissan Almera Tino engine produces 4 HP more power than Renault Scenic, whereas torque is 82 NM more than Renault Scenic. Despite the higher power, Nissan Almera Tino reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 7.3 | |
|
The Nissan Almera Tino is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Almera Tino consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Scenic, which means that by driving the Nissan Almera Tino over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 930 km in combined cycle | 820 km in combined cycle | |
| 1130 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| Nissan Almera Tino gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 390'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 3 years | 26 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Nissan Almera | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Renault Laguna, Renault Clio, Dacia Duster | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Scenic might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Renault Scenic 2001 1.6 engine: The engine is very robust and long-lived, up to half a million kilometres, and can suffer minor damage, but overall it is quite reliable. Fuel consumption is relatively high for these engines, but they are not ... More about Renault Scenic 2001 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.26 m | 4.17 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Nissan Almera Tino is larger, but lower. Nissan Almera Tino is 9 cm longer than the Renault Scenic, 6 cm wider, while the height of Nissan Almera Tino is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 440 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1950 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Almera Tino is 0.3 metres less than that of the Renault Scenic. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`940 | 1`300 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Almera Tino has
|
Renault Scenic has
| |