Nissan Almera Tino 2000 vs Opel Combo 2001
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 1.7 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 114 HP | 65 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 NM | 130 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | 18.5 seconds | |
|
Nissan Almera Tino is more dynamic to drive. Nissan Almera Tino engine produces 49 HP more power than Opel Combo, whereas torque is 100 NM more than Opel Combo. Thanks to more power Nissan Almera Tino reaches 100 km/h speed 6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 5.4 | |
|
The Opel Combo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Almera Tino consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Combo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Almera Tino could require 150 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 52 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 930 km in combined cycle | 960 km in combined cycle | |
| 1130 km on highway | 1100 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.26 m | 4.32 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.80 m | |
| Nissan Almera Tino is 6 cm shorter than the Opel Combo, 8 cm wider, while the height of Nissan Almera Tino is 19 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 440 litres | 455 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1950 litres | no data | |
| Nissan Almera Tino has 15 litres less trunk space than the Opel Combo. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Almera Tino is 0.8 metres less than that of the Opel Combo, which means Nissan Almera Tino can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`940 | 1`990 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Almera Tino has
|
Opel Combo has
| |