Nissan Almera Tino 2000 vs Ford C-Max 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Double-row timing chain | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 114 HP | 109 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | 11.3 seconds | |
|
Ford C-Max is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Almera Tino engine produces 5 HP more power than Ford C-Max, but torque is 10 NM less than Ford C-Max. Despite the higher power, Nissan Almera Tino reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 4.9 | |
|
The Ford C-Max is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Almera Tino consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford C-Max, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Almera Tino could require 225 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 930 km in combined cycle | 1120 km in combined cycle | |
| 1130 km on highway | 1340 km on highway | ||
| Ford C-Max gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 390'000 km | 310'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Nissan Almera Tino engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 3 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Nissan Almera | Used also on Ford Focus | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Ford C-Max might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Ford C-Max engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.26 m | 4.33 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.60 m | |
|
Nissan Almera Tino is smaller, but slightly higher. Nissan Almera Tino is 7 cm shorter than the Ford C-Max, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Almera Tino is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 440 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1950 litres | 1620 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Almera Tino is 0.3 metres less than that of the Ford C-Max. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`940 | no data | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Almera Tino has
|
Ford C-Max has
| |