Nissan Almera Tino 2000 vs Toyota Corolla Verso 2002
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 135 HP | |
| Torque: | 175 NM | 170 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.6 seconds | 11 seconds | |
| Nissan Almera Tino engine produces 1 HP more power than Toyota Corolla Verso, whereas torque is 5 NM more than Toyota Corolla Verso. Despite the higher power, Nissan Almera Tino reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.3 | 8.2 | |
|
The Toyota Corolla Verso is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Almera Tino consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Corolla Verso, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Almera Tino could require 165 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 640 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
| 830 km on highway | 820 km on highway | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Nissan Primera, Nissan Serena | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Corolla, Toyota RAV4 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Corolla Verso might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Nissan Almera Tino engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Toyota Corolla Verso 2002 1.8 engine: The 1ZZ-FE engine is more advanced, lighter, and simpler than its predecessor, emphasizing fuel efficiency and output. However, these improvements have come at the cost of reduced durability compared to earlier cast-iron engines. The engine block features an open-deck cooling design for easier production and lower ... More about Toyota Corolla Verso 2002 1.8 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.26 m | 4.24 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.61 m | |
|
Nissan Almera Tino is larger. Nissan Almera Tino is 2 cm longer than the Toyota Corolla Verso, 6 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 440 litres | 417 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1950 litres | no data | |
|
Nissan Almera Tino has more luggage capacity. Nissan Almera Tino has 23 litres more trunk space than the Toyota Corolla Verso. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Almera Tino is 0.4 metres more than that of the Toyota Corolla Verso, which means Nissan Almera Tino can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`920 | 1`725 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Almera Tino has
|
Toyota Corolla Verso has
| |