Nissan Almera Tino 2000 vs Mitsubishi Space Star 2000
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 122 HP | |
| Torque: | 175 NM | 174 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.6 seconds | 12.4 seconds | |
| Nissan Almera Tino engine produces 14 HP more power than Mitsubishi Space Star, whereas torque is 1 NM more than Mitsubishi Space Star. Despite the higher power, Nissan Almera Tino reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.3 | 8.3 | |
|
The Mitsubishi Space Star is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Almera Tino consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Space Star, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Almera Tino could require 150 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 640 km in combined cycle | 660 km in combined cycle | |
| 830 km on highway | 830 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 23 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Nissan Primera, Nissan Serena | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Volvo V40, Volvo S40, Mitsubishi Carisma, Mitsubishi Galant | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Space Star might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.26 m | 4.03 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.52 m | |
|
Nissan Almera Tino is larger. Nissan Almera Tino is 23 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Space Star, 4 cm wider, while the height of Nissan Almera Tino is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 440 litres | 370 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1950 litres | 1370 litres | |
|
Nissan Almera Tino has more luggage capacity. Nissan Almera Tino has 70 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Space Star. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Almera Tino (by 580 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 9.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Almera Tino is 0.8 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Space Star, which means Nissan Almera Tino can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`920 | 1`730 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Almera Tino has
|
Mitsubishi Space Star has
| |