Nissan Almera Tino 2000 vs Mitsubishi Space Wagon 1999
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 114 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 158 NM | 225 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.7 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Wagon is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Almera Tino engine produces 36 HP less power than Mitsubishi Space Wagon, whereas torque is 67 NM less than Mitsubishi Space Wagon. Due to the lower power, Nissan Almera Tino reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.8 | 9.3 | |
|
The Nissan Almera Tino is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Almera Tino consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Space Wagon, which means that by driving the Nissan Almera Tino over 15,000 km in a year you can save 225 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 63 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
| 950 km on highway | 820 km on highway | ||
| Nissan Almera Tino gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 460'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mitsubishi Space Wagon engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 40 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Nissan Almera, Nissan Primera, Nissan Sentra | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Mitsubishi Galant, Mitsubishi Space Runner | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Space Wagon might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Mitsubishi Space Wagon engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.26 m | 4.60 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.65 m | |
|
Nissan Almera Tino is smaller. Nissan Almera Tino is 34 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Space Wagon, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Almera Tino is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 440 litres | 240 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 240 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 440 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1950 litres | 240 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Almera Tino (by 1710 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Almera Tino is 0.6 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Space Wagon, which means Nissan Almera Tino can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`830 | 2`180 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Almera Tino has
|
Mitsubishi Space Wagon has
| |