Nissan Almera Tino 2003 vs Toyota Corolla 2004
| Body: | Minivan / MPV | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 304 NM | 215 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 12.6 seconds | |
|
Nissan Almera Tino is more dynamic to drive. Nissan Almera Tino engine produces 46 HP more power than Toyota Corolla, whereas torque is 89 NM more than Toyota Corolla. Thanks to more power Nissan Almera Tino reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 5.7 | |
|
The Toyota Corolla is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Almera Tino consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Corolla, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Almera Tino could require 135 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 900 km in combined cycle | 960 km in combined cycle | |
| 1090 km on highway | 1140 km on highway | ||
| Toyota Corolla gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 440'000 km | 280'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Nissan Almera Tino engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Almera, Nissan Primera | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota RAV4, Toyota Corolla Verso | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Corolla might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Toyota Corolla 2004 2.0 engine: The engine was known for its solid technical characteristics.
One of its drawbacks is the lack of hydraulic lifters, requiring periodic valve clearance adjustments. The next-generation 1AD-FTV engine was equipped with ... More about Toyota Corolla 2004 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.26 m | 4.41 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.47 m | |
| Nissan Almera Tino is 15 cm shorter than the Toyota Corolla, 5 cm wider, while the height of Nissan Almera Tino is 14 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 440 litres | 437 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1950 litres | no data | |
| Nissan Almera Tino has 3 litres more trunk space than the Toyota Corolla. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Almera Tino is 0.4 metres more than that of the Toyota Corolla, which means Nissan Almera Tino can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`940 | 1`760 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Almera Tino has
|
Toyota Corolla has
| |