Nissan Almera Tino 2003 vs Mazda Premacy 1999
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 304 NM | 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 12.9 seconds | |
|
Nissan Almera Tino is more dynamic to drive. Nissan Almera Tino engine produces 46 HP more power than Mazda Premacy, whereas torque is 84 NM more than Mazda Premacy. Thanks to more power Nissan Almera Tino reaches 100 km/h speed 2.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 5.7 | |
|
The Mazda Premacy is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Almera Tino consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda Premacy, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Almera Tino could require 135 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 900 km in combined cycle | 1010 km in combined cycle | |
| 1090 km on highway | 1180 km on highway | ||
| Mazda Premacy gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 440'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Almera, Nissan Primera | Used also on Mazda 323 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Almera Tino might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.26 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.57 m | |
| Nissan Almera Tino is 4 cm shorter than the Mazda Premacy, 6 cm wider, while the height of Nissan Almera Tino is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 440 litres | 420 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1950 litres | 1848 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Nissan Almera Tino has 20 litres more trunk space than the Mazda Premacy. The Mazda Premacy may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Almera Tino (by 102 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Almera Tino is 0.2 metres less than that of the Mazda Premacy. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`940 | 1`820 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Almera Tino has
|
Mazda Premacy has
| |