Nissan Almera Tino 2003 vs Seat Altea 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 304 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
|
Seat Altea is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Almera Tino engine produces 4 HP less power than Seat Altea, whereas torque is 16 NM less than Seat Altea. Due to the lower power, Nissan Almera Tino reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 5.8 | |
|
The Seat Altea is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Almera Tino consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Altea, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Almera Tino could require 120 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 900 km in combined cycle | 940 km in combined cycle | |
| 1090 km on highway | 1170 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.26 m | 4.28 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.57 m | |
|
Nissan Almera Tino is smaller, but slightly higher. Nissan Almera Tino is 2 cm shorter than the Seat Altea, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Almera Tino is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 440 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1950 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Almera Tino is 0.3 metres less than that of the Seat Altea. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`940 | 1`400 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Almera Tino has
|
Seat Altea has
| |