Nissan Almera Tino 2003 vs Renault Scenic 2001
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 105 HP | |
| Torque: | 304 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 12.8 seconds | |
|
Nissan Almera Tino is more dynamic to drive. Nissan Almera Tino engine produces 31 HP more power than Renault Scenic, whereas torque is 104 NM more than Renault Scenic. Thanks to more power Nissan Almera Tino reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 5.9 | |
|
The Renault Scenic is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Almera Tino consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Scenic, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Almera Tino could require 105 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 900 km in combined cycle | 1010 km in combined cycle | |
| 1090 km on highway | 1220 km on highway | ||
| Renault Scenic gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 440'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Almera, Nissan Primera | Installed on at least 11 other car models, including Volvo V40, Renault Laguna, Volvo S40, Mitsubishi Carisma | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Scenic might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Renault Scenic 2001 1.9 engine: Long-lasting and fuel-efficient engine. Maintaining oil change and maintenance intervals is essential for a long engine life, as poor or untimely oil changes can result in turbine and oil pump damage, followed ... More about Renault Scenic 2001 1.9 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.26 m | 4.17 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Nissan Almera Tino is larger, but lower. Nissan Almera Tino is 9 cm longer than the Renault Scenic, 6 cm wider, while the height of Nissan Almera Tino is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 440 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1950 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Almera Tino is 0.1 metres less than that of the Renault Scenic. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`940 | 1`300 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Almera Tino has
|
Renault Scenic has
| |