Nissan Almera Tino 2003 vs Renault Scenic 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 304 NM | 152 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 12.5 seconds | |
|
Nissan Almera Tino is more dynamic to drive. Nissan Almera Tino engine produces 21 HP more power than Renault Scenic, whereas torque is 152 NM more than Renault Scenic. Thanks to more power Nissan Almera Tino reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 7.2 | |
|
The Nissan Almera Tino is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Almera Tino consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Scenic, which means that by driving the Nissan Almera Tino over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 900 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 1090 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| Nissan Almera Tino gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 440'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 26 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Almera, Nissan Primera | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Renault Laguna, Renault Clio, Dacia Duster | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Scenic might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Renault Scenic 2003 1.6 engine: The engine is very robust and long-lived, up to half a million kilometres, and can suffer minor damage, but overall it is quite reliable. Fuel consumption is relatively high for these engines, but they are not ... More about Renault Scenic 2003 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.26 m | 4.26 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.62 m | |
| Nissan Almera Tino and Renault Scenic are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 440 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1950 litres | 1840 litres | |
| Nissan Almera Tino has 10 litres more trunk space than the Renault Scenic. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Almera Tino (by 110 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Almera Tino is 0.1 metres less than that of the Renault Scenic. | |||
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`940 | 1`915 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Almera Tino has
|
Renault Scenic has
| |