Nissan Almera Tino 2003 vs Ford C-Max 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 109 HP | |
| Torque: | 304 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 11.3 seconds | |
|
Nissan Almera Tino is more dynamic to drive. Nissan Almera Tino engine produces 27 HP more power than Ford C-Max, whereas torque is 64 NM more than Ford C-Max. Thanks to more power Nissan Almera Tino reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 4.9 | |
|
The Ford C-Max is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Almera Tino consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford C-Max, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Almera Tino could require 255 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 900 km in combined cycle | 1120 km in combined cycle | |
| 1090 km on highway | 1340 km on highway | ||
| Ford C-Max gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 440'000 km | 310'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Nissan Almera Tino engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Almera, Nissan Primera | Used also on Ford Focus | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Almera Tino might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Ford C-Max engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.26 m | 4.33 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.60 m | |
|
Nissan Almera Tino is smaller, but slightly higher. Nissan Almera Tino is 7 cm shorter than the Ford C-Max, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Almera Tino is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 440 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1950 litres | 1620 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Almera Tino is 0.1 metres less than that of the Ford C-Max. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`940 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Almera Tino has
|
Ford C-Max has
| |