Nissan Almera Tino 2003 vs Volkswagen Touran 2003
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 116 HP | |
| Torque: | 163 NM | 155 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.2 seconds | 13.2 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Touran is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Almera Tino engine produces 1 HP less power than Volkswagen Touran, but torque is 8 NM more than Volkswagen Touran. Due to the lower power, Nissan Almera Tino reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.2 | 7.9 | |
| Nissan Almera Tino consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Touran, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Almera Tino could require 45 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 730 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
| 900 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
| Ground clearance: | 150 mm (5.9 inches) | 127 mm (5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Nissan Almera Tino can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Nissan Almera Tino version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 4 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Nissan Almera, Nissan Primera, Nissan Sentra | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Volkswagen Passat, Volkswagen Golf, Skoda Octavia, Audi A3 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Volkswagen Touran engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.26 m | 4.39 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.65 m | |
|
Nissan Almera Tino is smaller. Nissan Almera Tino is 13 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Touran, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Almera Tino is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 440 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1950 litres | 1989 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Almera Tino is 0.6 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Touran, which means Nissan Almera Tino can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Almera Tino has
|
Volkswagen Touran has
| |