Nissan Almera Tino 2003 vs Mazda Premacy 1999
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 100 HP | |
| Torque: | 163 NM | 152 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.6 seconds | 11.8 seconds | |
|
Nissan Almera Tino is more dynamic to drive. Nissan Almera Tino engine produces 15 HP more power than Mazda Premacy, whereas torque is 11 NM more than Mazda Premacy. Thanks to more power Nissan Almera Tino reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 8.3 | |
|
The Nissan Almera Tino is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Almera Tino consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda Premacy, which means that by driving the Nissan Almera Tino over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
| 950 km on highway | 840 km on highway | ||
| Nissan Almera Tino gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 560'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mazda Premacy engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Nissan Almera, Nissan Primera, Nissan Sentra | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda 626, Mazda 323 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Almera Tino might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.26 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.57 m | |
| Nissan Almera Tino is 4 cm shorter than the Mazda Premacy, 6 cm wider, while the height of Nissan Almera Tino is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 440 litres | 420 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1950 litres | 1848 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Nissan Almera Tino has 20 litres more trunk space than the Mazda Premacy. The Mazda Premacy may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Almera Tino (by 102 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Almera Tino is 0.2 metres less than that of the Mazda Premacy. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`830 | 1`760 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Almera Tino has
|
Mazda Premacy has
| |