Nissan Almera Tino 2003 vs Honda FR-V 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.7 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 125 HP | |
| Torque: | 163 NM | 154 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.6 seconds | 12.3 seconds | |
|
Nissan Almera Tino is more dynamic to drive. Nissan Almera Tino engine produces 10 HP less power than Honda FR-V, but torque is 9 NM more than Honda FR-V. Despite less power, Nissan Almera Tino reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 7.5 | |
| Nissan Almera Tino consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda FR-V, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Almera Tino could require 30 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
| 950 km on highway | 890 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Honda FR-V engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Nissan Almera, Nissan Primera, Nissan Sentra | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Honda Civic, Honda Stream | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Almera Tino might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.26 m | 4.28 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.61 m | |
|
Nissan Almera Tino is smaller. Nissan Almera Tino is 2 cm shorter than the Honda FR-V, 5 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 440 litres | 439 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1950 litres | 1049 litres | |
| Nissan Almera Tino has 1 litres more trunk space than the Honda FR-V. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Almera Tino (by 901 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Almera Tino is 0.6 metres less than that of the Honda FR-V, which means Nissan Almera Tino can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`830 | 1`890 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Almera Tino has
|
Honda FR-V has
| |