Nissan Almera Tino 2000 vs Toyota Carina E 1992

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Nissan Almera Tino
2000 - 2003
Toyota Carina E
1992 - 1996
Body: Minivan / MPVHatchback
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.8 - 2.21.6 - 2.0

Performance

Power: 114 - 136 HP73 - 175 HP
Torque: 158 - 230 NM132 - 186 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.5 - 14.2 seconds8.4 - 16.4 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.4 - 9.35.8 - 8.5
Nissan Almera Tino petrol engines consumes on average 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than Toyota Carina E. On average, Nissan Almera Tino equipped with diesel engines consume 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Carina E.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.26 m4.53 m
Width: 1.76 m1.70 m
Height: 1.61 m1.41 m
Nissan Almera Tino is 27 cm shorter than the Toyota Carina E, 6 cm wider, while the height of Nissan Almera Tino is 20 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 440 litres470 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1950 litres1250 litres
Nissan Almera Tino has 30 litres less trunk space than the Toyota Carina E. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Almera Tino (by 700 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.4 meters10.8 meters
The turning circle of the Nissan Almera Tino is 0.4 metres less than that of the Toyota Carina E, which means Nissan Almera Tino can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`897~ 1`684
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
high
Average price (€): 10001200
Pros and Cons: Nissan Almera Tino has
  • lower price
Toyota Carina E has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv