Nissan Almera Tino 2000 vs Toyota Carina E 1992
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Body: | Minivan / MPV | Hatchback | |
---|---|---|---|
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
Engines: | 1.8 - 2.2 | 1.6 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 114 - 136 HP | 73 - 175 HP | |
Torque: | 158 - 230 NM | 132 - 186 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 - 14.2 seconds | 8.4 - 16.4 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 - 9.3 | 5.8 - 8.5 | |
Nissan Almera Tino petrol engines consumes on average 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than Toyota Carina E. On average, Nissan Almera Tino equipped with diesel engines consume 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Carina E. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.26 m | 4.53 m | |
Width: | 1.76 m | 1.70 m | |
Height: | 1.61 m | 1.41 m | |
Nissan Almera Tino is 27 cm shorter than the Toyota Carina E, 6 cm wider, while the height of Nissan Almera Tino is 20 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 440 litres | 470 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1950 litres | 1250 litres | |
Nissan Almera Tino has 30 litres less trunk space than the Toyota Carina E. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Almera Tino (by 700 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the Nissan Almera Tino is 0.4 metres less than that of the Toyota Carina E, which means Nissan Almera Tino can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`897 | ~ 1`684 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | high | |
Average price (€): | 1000 | 1200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Almera Tino has
|
Toyota Carina E has
| |