Nissan Almera Tino 2000 vs Renault Scenic 2001
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.8 - 2.2 | 1.4 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 114 - 136 HP | 80 - 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 158 - 230 NM | 127 - 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 - 14.2 seconds | 10.2 - 15.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 - 9.3 | 5.7 - 8.5 | |
|
Nissan Almera Tino petrol engines consumes on average 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than Renault Scenic. On average, Nissan Almera Tino equipped with diesel engines consume 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Scenic. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.26 m | 4.17 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Nissan Almera Tino is larger, but lower. Nissan Almera Tino is 9 cm longer than the Renault Scenic, 6 cm wider, while the height of Nissan Almera Tino is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 440 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1950 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Almera Tino is 0.3 metres less than that of the Renault Scenic. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`897 | ~ 1`306 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Renault Scenic has
| |