Nissan Almera Tino 2000 vs Mitsubishi Space Star 1998
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.8 - 2.2 | 1.3 - 1.9 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 114 - 136 HP | 82 - 122 HP | |
| Torque: | 158 - 230 NM | 117 - 215 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 - 14.2 seconds | 10.2 - 14.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 - 9.3 | 5.5 - 8.8 | |
|
Nissan Almera Tino petrol engines consumes on average 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi Space Star. On average, Nissan Almera Tino equipped with diesel engines consume 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Space Star. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.26 m | 4.03 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.52 m | |
|
Nissan Almera Tino is larger. Nissan Almera Tino is 23 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Space Star, 5 cm wider, while the height of Nissan Almera Tino is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 440 litres | 370 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1950 litres | 1370 litres | |
|
Nissan Almera Tino has more luggage capacity. Nissan Almera Tino has 70 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Space Star. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Almera Tino (by 580 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`897 | ~ 1`698 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Almera Tino has
|
Mitsubishi Space Star has
| |