Nissan Almera Tino 2000 vs Hyundai Matrix 2001
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.8 - 2.2 | 1.5 - 1.8 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 114 - 136 HP | 82 - 123 HP | |
| Torque: | 158 - 230 NM | 141 - 235 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 - 14.2 seconds | 11.3 - 17.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 - 9.3 | 5.4 - 9.1 | |
|
On average, the Nissan Almera Tino petrol engines consume nearly the same amount of fuel per 100 km as Hyundai Matrix. On average, Nissan Almera Tino equipped with diesel engines consume 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Matrix. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.26 m | 4.02 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.64 m | |
|
Nissan Almera Tino is larger, but slightly lower. Nissan Almera Tino is 24 cm longer than the Hyundai Matrix, 2 cm wider, while the height of Nissan Almera Tino is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 440 litres | 354 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1950 litres | 1284 litres | |
|
Nissan Almera Tino has more luggage capacity. Nissan Almera Tino has 86 litres more trunk space than the Hyundai Matrix. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Almera Tino (by 666 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`897 | ~ 1`813 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Almera Tino has
|
Hyundai Matrix has
| |