Nissan Almera Tino 2003 vs Toyota Camry 2001
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Minivan / MPV | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Engines: | 1.8 - 2.2 (petrol, diesel) | 2.4 - 3.0 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 112 - 136 HP | 152 - 186 HP | |
| Torque: | 163 - 304 NM | 218 - 273 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 - 14.2 seconds | 9.1 - 10.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 - 9.3 | 8.6 - 11.0 | |
|
Nissan Almera Tino petrol engines consumes on average 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Toyota Camry. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.26 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.50 m | |
|
Nissan Almera Tino is smaller, but higher. Nissan Almera Tino is 56 cm shorter than the Toyota Camry, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Almera Tino is 11 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 440 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1950 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Almera Tino is 0.4 metres less than that of the Toyota Camry, which means Nissan Almera Tino can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`908 | ~ 1`600 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 4000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Almera Tino has
|
Toyota Camry has
| |