Nissan Almera Tino 2003 vs Mazda Premacy 1999
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 1.8 - 2.2 | 1.8 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 112 - 136 HP | 90 - 115 HP | |
Torque: | 163 - 304 NM | 152 - 230 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 - 14.2 seconds | 11.4 - 12.9 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 - 9.3 | 5.7 - 9.2 | |
Nissan Almera Tino petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mazda Premacy. On average, Nissan Almera Tino equipped with diesel engines consume 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda Premacy. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.26 m | 4.30 m | |
Width: | 1.76 m | 1.70 m | |
Height: | 1.61 m | 1.57 m | |
Nissan Almera Tino is 4 cm shorter than the Mazda Premacy, 6 cm wider, while the height of Nissan Almera Tino is 4 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 440 litres | 420 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1950 litres | 1848 litres | |
Even though the car is shorter, Nissan Almera Tino has 20 litres more trunk space than the Mazda Premacy. The Mazda Premacy may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Almera Tino (by 102 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the Nissan Almera Tino is 0.2 metres less than that of the Mazda Premacy. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`908 | ~ 1`784 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | above average | |
Average price (€): | 1200 | 800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
|
Mazda Premacy has
| |