Nissan 200 SX 1988 vs Jaguar XJS 1991
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 5.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 169 HP | 284 HP | |
| Torque: | 224 NM | 415 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.5 seconds | 8.2 seconds | |
| Nissan 200 SX engine produces 115 HP less power than Jaguar XJS, whereas torque is 191 NM less than Jaguar XJS. Despite less power, Nissan 200 SX reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.1 | 13.4 | |
|
The Nissan 200 SX is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan 200 SX consumes 4.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar XJS, which means that by driving the Nissan 200 SX over 15,000 km in a year you can save 645 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 89 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 660 km in combined cycle | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.54 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.29 m | 1.25 m | |
|
Nissan 200 SX is smaller, but slightly higher. Nissan 200 SX is 29 cm shorter than the Jaguar XJS, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan 200 SX is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 320 litres | 407 litres | |
|
Jaguar XJS has more luggage space. Nissan 200 SX has 87 litres less trunk space than the Jaguar XJS. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 13 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 1`675 kg | 2`175 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 17 000 | 20 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan 200 SX has
|
Jaguar XJS has
| |