Nissan 200 SX 1988 vs BMW 8 series 1989
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 5.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 169 HP | 300 HP | |
| Torque: | 224 NM | 450 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.5 seconds | 7.4 seconds | |
| Nissan 200 SX engine produces 131 HP less power than BMW 8 series, whereas torque is 226 NM less than BMW 8 series. Due to the lower power, Nissan 200 SX reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.1 | 13.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.1 l/100km | 14.9 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan 200 SX is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan 200 SX consumes 3.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW 8 series, which means that by driving the Nissan 200 SX over 15,000 km in a year you can save 585 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan 200 SX consumes 4.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW 8 series. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 90 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
| 590 km with real consumption | 600 km with real consumption | ||
| BMW 8 series gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.54 m | 4.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.29 m | 1.34 m | |
|
Nissan 200 SX is smaller. Nissan 200 SX is 17 cm shorter than the BMW 8 series, 17 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan 200 SX is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 320 litres | 320 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 12 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 1`675 kg | 2`190 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 17 000 | 26 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan 200 SX has
|
BMW 8 sērija has
| |