Nissan 200 SX 1997 vs Mercedes CLK 1997
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 200 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 265 NM | 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.3 seconds | 11.5 seconds | |
|
Nissan 200 SX is more dynamic to drive. Nissan 200 SX engine produces 64 HP more power than Mercedes CLK, whereas torque is 75 NM more than Mercedes CLK. Thanks to more power Nissan 200 SX reaches 100 km/h speed 3.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.9 | 9.5 | |
|
The Nissan 200 SX is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan 200 SX consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes CLK, which means that by driving the Nissan 200 SX over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 730 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
| 950 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
| Nissan 200 SX gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.57 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.30 m | 1.37 m | |
| Nissan 200 SX is 5 cm shorter than the Mercedes CLK, 1 cm wider, while the height of Nissan 200 SX is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 307 litres | 420 litres | |
|
Mercedes CLK has more luggage space. Nissan 200 SX has 113 litres less trunk space than the Mercedes CLK. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.6 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan 200 SX is 1.1 metres less than that of the Mercedes CLK, which means Nissan 200 SX can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`780 | 1`800 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan 200 SX has
|
Mercedes CLK has
| |