Nissan 200 SX 1994 vs Chrysler Sebring 1994
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 200 HP | 147 HP | |
| Torque: | 265 NM | 174 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.3 seconds | 11 seconds | |
|
Nissan 200 SX is more dynamic to drive. Nissan 200 SX engine produces 53 HP more power than Chrysler Sebring, whereas torque is 91 NM more than Chrysler Sebring. Thanks to more power Nissan 200 SX reaches 100 km/h speed 2.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.3 | 8.6 | |
|
The Chrysler Sebring is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan 200 SX consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Sebring, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan 200 SX could require 105 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Chrysler Sebring) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Nissan 200 SX) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.76 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.30 m | 1.30 m | |
|
Nissan 200 SX is smaller, but slightly higher. Nissan 200 SX is 24 cm shorter than the Chrysler Sebring, 4 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 307 litres | 370 litres | |
|
Chrysler Sebring has more luggage space. Nissan 200 SX has 63 litres less trunk space than the Chrysler Sebring. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.6 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`780 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan 200 SX has
|
Chrysler Sebring has
| |