Nissan 200 SX 1994 vs Mazda MX-3 1994
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 200 HP | 132 HP | |
| Torque: | 265 NM | 160 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.5 seconds | 8.5 seconds | |
|
Nissan 200 SX is more dynamic to drive. Nissan 200 SX engine produces 68 HP more power than Mazda MX-3, whereas torque is 105 NM more than Mazda MX-3. Thanks to more power Nissan 200 SX reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.8 | 9.5 | |
|
The Nissan 200 SX is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan 200 SX consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda MX-3, which means that by driving the Nissan 200 SX over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 730 km in combined cycle | 520 km in combined cycle | |
| Nissan 200 SX gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Mazda MX-3) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Nissan 200 SX) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.22 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.30 m | 1.31 m | |
|
Nissan 200 SX is larger, but slightly lower. Nissan 200 SX is 30 cm longer than the Mazda MX-3, 3 cm wider, while the height of Nissan 200 SX is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 307 litres | 289 litres | |
| Nissan 200 SX has 18 litres more trunk space than the Mazda MX-3. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.6 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan 200 SX is 0.2 metres less than that of the Mazda MX-3. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`780 | 1`540 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan 200 SX has
|
| |