Nissan 200 SX 1994 vs Honda Prelude 1996
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 200 HP | 133 HP | |
| Torque: | 265 NM | 179 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.5 seconds | 9.2 seconds | |
|
Nissan 200 SX is more dynamic to drive. Nissan 200 SX engine produces 67 HP more power than Honda Prelude, whereas torque is 86 NM more than Honda Prelude. Thanks to more power Nissan 200 SX reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.8 | 9.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.5 l/100km | 9.0 l/100km | |
|
The Honda Prelude is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Nissan 200 SX consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda Prelude, which means that by driving the Nissan 200 SX over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Nissan 200 SX consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda Prelude. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 730 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
| 610 km with real consumption | 660 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Honda Prelude) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Nissan 200 SX) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.54 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.30 m | 1.32 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Nissan 200 SX is 2 cm shorter than the Honda Prelude, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan 200 SX is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 307 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.6 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan 200 SX is 1.4 metres less than that of the Honda Prelude, which means Nissan 200 SX can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`780 | 1`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan 200 SX has
|
| |