Nissan 200 SX 1994 vs Audi Coupe 1991
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 200 HP | 116 HP | |
| Torque: | 265 NM | 165 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.5 seconds | 10.9 seconds | |
|
Nissan 200 SX is more dynamic to drive. Nissan 200 SX engine produces 84 HP more power than Audi Coupe, whereas torque is 100 NM more than Audi Coupe. Thanks to more power Nissan 200 SX reaches 100 km/h speed 3.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.8 | 8.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.5 l/100km | 9.0 l/100km | |
|
The Audi Coupe is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan 200 SX consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi Coupe, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan 200 SX could require 90 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan 200 SX consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi Coupe. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 730 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
| 610 km with real consumption | 770 km with real consumption | ||
| Audi Coupe gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Audi Coupe) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Nissan 200 SX) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.30 m | 1.38 m | |
|
Nissan 200 SX is larger, but lower. Nissan 200 SX is 15 cm longer than the Audi Coupe, 1 cm wider, while the height of Nissan 200 SX is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 307 litres | 296 litres | |
| Nissan 200 SX has 11 litres more trunk space than the Audi Coupe. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.6 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan 200 SX is 1.4 metres less than that of the Audi Coupe, which means Nissan 200 SX can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`780 | 1`650 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan 200 SX has
|
Audi Coupe has
| |