Nissan 200 SX 1988 vs Subaru Legacy 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Body: | Coupe | Estate car / wagon | |
---|---|---|---|
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Nissan 200 SX is available with rear wheel drive, while Subaru Legacy can be equipped with four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
Engines: | 1.8 | 2.0 - 3.0 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 169 HP | 138 - 245 HP | |
Torque: | 224 NM | 187 - 297 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.5 seconds | 7 - 13.2 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.1 | 7.7 - 11.9 | |
Nissan 200 SX petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Subaru Legacy. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.54 m | 4.72 m | |
Width: | 1.69 m | 1.73 m | |
Height: | 1.29 m | 1.47 m | |
Nissan 200 SX is smaller. Nissan 200 SX is 19 cm shorter than the Subaru Legacy, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan 200 SX is 18 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 320 litres | 459 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1649 litres | |
Subaru Legacy has more luggage space. Nissan 200 SX has 139 litres less trunk space than the Subaru Legacy. | |||
Turning diameter: | no data | 10.8 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`675 | ~ 1`964 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | high | |
Average price (€): | 17 000 | 1800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
|
Subaru Legacy has
| |