Nissan 200 SX 1994 vs Mitsubishi 3000 GT 1992
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Nissan 200 SX is available with both manual and automatic gearboxes, whereas Mitsubishi 3000 GT is available only with manual gearbox. | |||
Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Nissan 200 SX is available with rear wheel drive, while Mitsubishi 3000 GT can be equipped with four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
Engines: | 2.0 | 3.0 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 200 HP | 286 HP | |
Torque: | 265 NM | 407 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.5 - 8.3 seconds | 5.9 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.8 - 9.3 | 11.1 - 12.4 | |
Nissan 200 SX petrol engines consumes on average 2.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi 3000 GT. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.52 m | 4.57 m | |
Width: | 1.73 m | 1.84 m | |
Height: | 1.30 m | 1.28 m | |
Nissan 200 SX is smaller, but slightly higher. Nissan 200 SX is 5 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi 3000 GT, 11 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan 200 SX is 2 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 307 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 9.6 meters | 11.4 meters | |
The turning circle of the Nissan 200 SX is 1.8 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi 3000 GT, which means Nissan 200 SX can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`780 | no data | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | no data | 25 000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Nissan 200 SX has
|
Mitsubishi 3000 GT has
| |