Nissan 200 SX 1994 vs Mazda MX-3 1991
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nissan 200 SX is available with both manual and automatic gearboxes, whereas Mazda MX-3 is available only with manual gearbox. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Nissan 200 SX is available with rear wheel drive, while Mazda MX-3 can be equipped with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 | 1.6 - 1.8 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 200 HP | 90 - 135 HP | |
| Torque: | 265 NM | 135 - 160 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.5 - 8.3 seconds | 8.5 - 10.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.8 - 9.3 | 6.9 - 9.5 | |
|
Nissan 200 SX petrol engines consumes on average 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mazda MX-3. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.22 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.30 m | 1.31 m | |
|
Nissan 200 SX is larger, but slightly lower. Nissan 200 SX is 30 cm longer than the Mazda MX-3, 3 cm wider, while the height of Nissan 200 SX is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 307 litres | 289 litres | |
| Nissan 200 SX has 18 litres more trunk space than the Mazda MX-3. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.6 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan 200 SX is 0.2 metres less than that of the Mazda MX-3. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`780 | ~ 1`474 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan 200 SX has
|
Mazda MX-3 has
| |