Nissan 200 SX 1994 vs SAAB 900 1994
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Nissan 200 SX is available with rear wheel drive, while SAAB 900 can be equipped with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 | 2.0 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 200 HP | 130 - 185 HP | |
| Torque: | 265 NM | 177 - 263 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.5 - 8.3 seconds | 8.5 - 12.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.8 - 9.3 | 8.4 - 11.3 | |
|
Nissan 200 SX petrol engines consumes on average 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than SAAB 900. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.30 m | 1.44 m | |
| Nissan 200 SX is 12 cm shorter than the SAAB 900, 2 cm wider, while the height of Nissan 200 SX is 14 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 307 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.6 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan 200 SX is 1.3 metres less than that of the SAAB 900, which means Nissan 200 SX can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`780 | ~ 1`600 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan 200 SX has
|
| |