Nissan 200 SX 1994 vs Hyundai Coupe 1996
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Nissan 200 SX is available with rear wheel drive, while Hyundai Coupe can be equipped with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 | 1.6 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 200 HP | 114 - 139 HP | |
| Torque: | 265 NM | 145 - 182 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.5 - 8.3 seconds | 8.6 - 10.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.8 - 9.3 | 8.3 - 9.9 | |
|
Nissan 200 SX petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Hyundai Coupe. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.34 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.30 m | 1.31 m | |
| Nissan 200 SX is 18 cm longer than the Hyundai Coupe, width is practically the same , while the height of Nissan 200 SX is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 307 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 362 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.6 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan 200 SX is 1.4 metres less than that of the Hyundai Coupe, which means Nissan 200 SX can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`780 | ~ 1`600 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan 200 SX has
|
| |