Nissan 200 SX 1994 vs Honda Prelude 1996
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Nissan 200 SX is available with rear wheel drive, while Honda Prelude can be equipped with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 | 2.0 - 2.2 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 200 HP | 133 - 200 HP | |
| Torque: | 265 NM | 179 - 211 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.5 - 8.3 seconds | 7.5 - 10.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.8 - 9.3 | 9.2 - 10.4 | |
|
Nissan 200 SX petrol engines consumes on average 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than Honda Prelude. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.54 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.30 m | 1.32 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Nissan 200 SX is 2 cm shorter than the Honda Prelude, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan 200 SX is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 307 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.6 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan 200 SX is 1.4 metres less than that of the Honda Prelude, which means Nissan 200 SX can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`780 | ~ 1`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan 200 SX has
|
| |