Nissan 200 SX 1994 vs Chrysler Sebring 1994
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Nissan 200 SX is available with rear wheel drive, while Chrysler Sebring can be equipped with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 | 2.0 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 200 HP | 141 - 166 HP | |
| Torque: | 265 NM | 174 - 230 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.5 - 8.3 seconds | 10.5 - 11 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.8 - 9.3 | 8.6 - 11.5 | |
|
Nissan 200 SX petrol engines consumes on average 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than Chrysler Sebring. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.78 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.30 m | 1.31 m | |
|
Nissan 200 SX is smaller. Nissan 200 SX is 26 cm shorter than the Chrysler Sebring, 4 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 307 litres | 370 litres | |
|
Chrysler Sebring has more luggage space. Nissan 200 SX has 63 litres less trunk space than the Chrysler Sebring. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.6 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`780 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan 200 SX has
|
Chrysler Sebring has
| |