Nissan 200 SX 1994 vs BMW 8 series 1989
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 (petrol) | 3.0 - 5.6 (petrol, diesel) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol engines. BMW 8 series is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 200 HP | 218 - 381 HP | |
| Torque: | 265 NM | 400 - 550 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.5 - 8.3 seconds | 6 - 7.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.8 - 9.3 | 11.0 - 18.0 | |
|
Nissan 200 SX petrol engines consumes on average 4.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than BMW 8 series. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.77 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.30 m | 1.34 m | |
|
Nissan 200 SX is smaller. Nissan 200 SX is 25 cm shorter than the BMW 8 series, 13 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan 200 SX is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 307 litres | 320 litres | |
| Nissan 200 SX has 13 litres less trunk space than the BMW 8 series. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.6 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan 200 SX is 2.4 metres less than that of the BMW 8 series, which means Nissan 200 SX can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`780 | ~ 2`230 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 24 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan 200 SX has
|
BMW 8 sērija has
| |