Nissan 200 SX 1994 vs Audi Coupe 1991
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Nissan 200 SX is available only with rear wheel drive, while Audi Coupe can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 | 2.0 - 2.8 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 200 HP | 116 - 174 HP | |
| Torque: | 265 NM | 165 - 245 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.5 - 8.3 seconds | 8.2 - 13.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.8 - 9.3 | 8.2 - 10.3 | |
|
Nissan 200 SX petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Audi Coupe. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.30 m | 1.38 m | |
|
Nissan 200 SX is larger, but lower. Nissan 200 SX is 15 cm longer than the Audi Coupe, 1 cm wider, while the height of Nissan 200 SX is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 307 litres | 296 litres | |
| Nissan 200 SX has 11 litres more trunk space than the Audi Coupe. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.6 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan 200 SX is 1.4 metres less than that of the Audi Coupe, which means Nissan 200 SX can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`780 | ~ 1`738 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan 200 SX has
|
Audi Coupe has
| |