Moskvitch 408 1964 vs Mazda CX-3 2015

 
Moskvitch 408
1964 - 1975
Mazda CX-3
2015 - 2018
Body: SedanCrossover / SUV
Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs.
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.4 Petrol1.5 Diesel
Petrol engines (Moskvitch 408) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Mazda CX-3) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences.

Performance

Power: 50 HP105 HP
Torque: 92 NM270 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: n/a seconds10.5 seconds
Moskvitch 408 engine produces 55 HP less power than Mazda CX-3, whereas torque is 178 NM less than Mazda CX-3.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): no data4.7
Fuel tank capacity: 46 litres44 litres
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD)4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive)

Mazda CX-3 2014: AWD system delivers 98 percent of power to the front wheels under normal conditions, and up to 50 percent of torque can be shifted to the rear wheels in the event of wheel slip.

Dimensions

Length: 4.09 m4.28 m
Width: 1.55 m1.77 m
Height: 1.48 m1.55 m
Moskvitch 408 is smaller.
Moskvitch 408 is 19 cm shorter than the Mazda CX-3, 22 cm narrower, while the height of Moskvitch 408 is 7 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: no data350 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down, if possible
no data1260 litres
Turning diameter: no data10.6 meters
Gross weight: 1`330 kg1`800 kg
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
high
Average price (€): no data11 000
Pros and Cons:
    Mazda CX-3 has
    • more power
    • has 4x4 drive
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv