Moskvitch 2141 1994 vs Seat Toledo 1995
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.7 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 85 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 130 NM | 125 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.9 seconds | 13.3 seconds | |
| Moskvitch 2141 engine produces 10 HP more power than Seat Toledo, whereas torque is 5 NM more than Seat Toledo. Despite the higher power, Moskvitch 2141 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.9 | 7.3 | |
|
The Seat Toledo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Moskvitch 2141 consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Toledo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Moskvitch 2141 could require 90 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
| 900 km on highway | 910 km on highway | ||
| Seat Toledo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.35 m | 4.32 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.42 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Moskvitch 2141 is 3 cm longer than the Seat Toledo, 3 cm wider, while the height of Moskvitch 2141 is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.5 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`480 | 1`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Moskvitch 2141 has
|
Seat Toledo has
| |